People

Entries in Fairey (2)

Sunday
Oct112015

Avis Fairey and Mary Ann Jenkinson: RADICALS & BAPTISTS

Avis Fairey (c1804 – 1887) and Mary Ann Jenkinson (c1839 - 1919)

Lyn Watson recently e-mailed me to point out that there was an error in my account of Herbert Abington, the young son of the village grocer and chemist, who kept a diary detailing the last few years of his short life. Lyn also asked if I knew about the son of a Mary Ann Jenkinson who she believed was the illegitimate child of Leonard Joseph Abington, brother to the young Herbert.

This sent me looking through the records and I found an interesting family which was new to me although some of their stories have been well documented by others.

Avis Fairey was baptised in Ringstead Parish Church on 20th June 1813 (although born in about 1804), along with her sisters Phebe (Phoebe: born about 1801) and Pearcy (born about 1797). They were the children of John and Elizabeth Fairey (or Farey). Pearcy (or Peacy) married John Cheney on 23rd February 1826 in Ringstead Church but died in1830).  Phoebe married John Miller of Marefield in Leicestershire on 3rd April 1823 in Ringstead (although in 1851 she, like her younger sister Lucy, is living with her husband who appears to also come from Mancetter in Warwickshire: It seems likely that the two  sisters married two brothers).

Avis was married in Ringstead Church to Edward Jenkinson from Kettering on December 26th 1827. The witnesses were Edward’s brother, John Jenkinson, and Lucy Fairey, Avis’s younger sister (with this family baptism dates give little clue to the actual birth dates and in this case there are two girls baptised Lucy Fairey (or Farry) in Ringstead by different families). Lucy married Samuel Miller of Mancetter in Warwickshire on 31st May 1830 and, as we have said, moved back with him to his home county. Edward’s brother, John Jenkinson, wrote in his autobiography that Edward had been seriously ill in the February of the previous year with “Brain Fever” and was apparently cured by:

. . .  shaving the head of the dear sufferer, applying a blister* thereto, assiduous nursing, the skill of the medical advisor and above all by the Lord’s blessing on the user of these means

*The Victorians believed that the body could not have more than one illness at a time. They caused a blister by acid or burning to create this second “illness”

John Jenkinson also tells of the wedding and the journey he and his brother made to Ringstead.

On December 26th 1827, my brother was married in Ringstead parish church (Dissenters being at that time precluded from having the marriage services performed in their churches). I accompanied him for the purpose of giving away the bride. Our journey from Kettering was literally through the darkness and the deeps. We started from home before daylight and after travelling nearly six miles, we met a person who told us the flood was so great he did not think we should be able to get across Ringstead meadows, but as we had not time to go round by Thrapston we kept on our way and as a consequence got nearly up to our waists in water. However on reaching Ringstead we presently dried our clothes, and were at the church quite in time to have the marriage celebrated within the canonical hours. I preached at Ringstead Baptist Chapel in the evening and returned home on the following day.

John Jenkinson was born on 7th June 1799 and Edward on 13th February 1803 in Hallaton in Leicestershire. Although little mentioned in John’s autobiography there was also a sister, Lettice, who married John West in Kettering on 11th March 1830, and the youngest brother, Christopher, who married Mary Ann Green in Oundle in 1838.  Their mother’s father, the Reverend John Ayer, was a Baptist preacher and certainly John did receive some basic education at Hallaton Free School. Their father, Stephen, was a boot and shoe maker employing some four journeymen and apprentices. He lost much time and money pursuing his belief, which was wrong according to his son John Jenkinson, that he had a claim to a Derbyshire estate. His son described him as ‘some times more enterprising than provident’.

The whole family was struck down by a fever but they all survived except the father who died on 23rd June 1807 aged 32 years. John was eight and Edward four years old. All his stock in trade and the household furniture had to be sold to pay his debts and John states that an Uncle took this money to stave off his own insolvency.

The family were now very poor and John went first to act as a “monitor” for his father’s younger brother who was the master of a charity school in Tilton, some six miles away. John states that he, at nine years eight months old, ran the school almost single-handed, his uncle being often away at his shoemaking business. John was then apprenticed to another uncle as tailor but after being poorly treated, he left and was finally apprenticed to his great uncle, William Stafford, a blind seedsman and market gardener in Kettering. (The Stafford and Ayer family trees were twined together.) His uncle treated him as his own and left John the business in his will. John’s brother Edward then joined him in the business.

They both attended the Little Meeting House in Kettering which was a renowned Baptist church. It was famous for founding the Baptist Missionary Society in 1792. In 1878, John Jenkinson’s daughter died of typhoid in Madagascar in its service. Andrew Fuller was the main preacher at this time. When he died in 1815, it was taken over by Robert Hall but, as was common at the time, theological differences opened up divisions in the congregation and John led a small secession from the Little Meeting House and set up the Ebenezer Chapel. He became the pastor and main preacher. John soon decided that he wished to become a full time pastor and as, in 1825 he had purchased the gardens of his business at auction off the bankrupted John Cooper Gotch, he rented the orchard and market garden to Edward who carried on the business. When John took up a new post in Oakham in 1848 it was also his brother Edward who tried to keep the Ebenezer Chapel going.

So it appears that Avis and Edward had moved to Kettering soon after their marriage. Adult baptism makes it more difficult to work this out from the children’s births but we know that daughter Caroline was born there on 2nd August 1831 (but baptised over 30 years later) In the 1841 Census they family are living there with Edward’s brother, John, who is shown as a Baptist Minister. Edward is a gardener and the couple have six children Caroline 12, John 10, William 8, Henry 6, Mary 4 and Alfred 1.

By the 1851 Census we see that Edward and Avis are in Meeting House Yard in Kettering. Older brother John had married Selina Ashford (whom, he tells us, he first met on April 2nd 1838 and that it was love at first sight), the daughter of a Baptist Minister of Harpole, in her home village and he had moved in 1849 to Oakham in Rutland to take up the vacant post of Baptist Minister. With Edward (48) and Avis (47) are John (19) a gardener like his father, William (18) a tailor, Henry (16) also a gardener, Mary Ann (13) Alfred (11) and Edward (7).

Alfred died, aged 17 years, and was buried on the 24th August 1856 and Edward, aged 55, died quite suddenly on February 9th 1858 after a very short illness. His brother, John, had been a leading light in the local Chartists, Anti Corn Law League, Universal Suffrage Association, the Co-operative Movement (in 1829 he helped start the first, short lived, Co-operative Society in Kettering, and the Temperance movement (he spoke at the Northampton Temperance Union meeting in Ringstead on May 14th 1867). Edward’s commitment to the Ebenezer Chapel and his membership of the Kettering Radical Association ((later Chartist Society), together with the  warm relationship between the brothers suggests that they held similar views but we only know, from his brief obituary, that he was committed to the temperance cause. Perhaps his father’s early death meant that he, as the younger boy, did not have even the limited educational chances of his John and was always in a supporting role to his older brother. Nevertheless he was a delegate at the second "Unity" Conference between the middle class supporters of "Complete Suffrage" and the more radical working class Chartists. (John Jenkinson had attended the first Conference in April of the same year.) He  is shown as absent at the vital vote but this may just mean that he did not vote. It also seems that Edward’s son, John, was involved in the radical movement. He was a shoe manufacturer in a partnership which was dissolved in March 1874 and his life may have gone downhill after that. (A John Jenkinson involved in some fraud cases).

Life for Edward’s daughter Mary Ann, with whom we are most concerned, changed rapidly at this time. In early 1859 she gave birth to an illegitimate child, whom she named Albert Abington Jenkinson. It seems likely, but is as yet unproved, that the father was Leonard Joseph Abington, the grandson of his namesake who had been the Ringstead Baptist Minister until his death in 1849.

If this is the case he did not stay and “do the honourable thing” but escaped to London where in 1861 we find him, aged 24, staying with his uncle and aunt, John and Eliza (nee Bull) Edmonds in Trinity Street, St Mary’s,  Islington and working as a journeyman butcher. Meanwhile Mary Ann had married John Plummer. in Thorpe Malsor parish church, on 19th November 1860. In the 1861 Census she is a milliner living with her new husband, a staymaker, in Job’s Yard, off the High Street in Kettering. Next door is her widowed mother Avis with sons John, Henry and Edward and 85 year-old widowed mother (should be mother-in-law) Ann Whiting (she had remarried).There is also a grandson Albert A. Jenkinson aged two, who is Mary Ann’s son.

John Plummer, Mary Ann’s husband, was another radical, self-educated man who has written of his life and was an editor, pamphleteer and poet. He had been born in Aldgate in London and a childhood illness had left him partially deaf and lame. He lived with his parents in Royal Mint Street (then known as Rosemary Lane) where his father had a small business making stays (corsets). John writes with typical Victorian colour and prejudice about this area:

Near to the Tower of London exists a neighbourhood unequalled for squalidness, poverty and misery. I refer to the purlieus of Royal Mint Street as it is now ambitiously designated but which is better known by its ancient title of Rosemary Lane, although it is many, many years since it deserved a name which awakens the thoughts of sunny orchards, green meadows and all the glorious beauty of nature. Old clothes’ shops, kept by persons of unmistakably Jewish extraction; dirty low places by courtesy termed “grocery stores”, milkshops, potatoe[sic] sheds and flaunting handsome “gin palaces”, line the main street which forms the chief artery of the labyrinth of long, narrow, filthy courts inhabited by Irish labourers and the lowest and most poverty stricken of the London poor; and where scenes are daily, nay hourly, enacted, which are sufficient to “make the Angels weep”; and to mock the proud boast of our vaunted progress in the path of civilisation.

His father had contracted a serious illness which left him unable to work for a time and his stay business failed so the family had been forced to move into the attic of his grandmother and John was looked after by his uncle in St. Albans for a time. He had little education but taught himself to read from the old bookstalls in the East End, reading a few pages at a time.  His father improved and became a foreman and then started up again with his own staymaking business and John worked for him as an errand boy. He started going to evening classes at the Spitalfields School of Design. He went straight from his work and was laughed at and bullied by the other students for his appearance but in spite of this did well and was presented with a prize by Earl Granville at Crosby Hall for “best online drawing from the flat”.

Unfortunately his father’s business failed again and he found a post in a Kettering factory. John was offered the chance to continue his studies free of charge but could not afford to remain in London alone and so in 1853 he went with the family to Kettering. He found work in a factory on a steam cutting machine. He was offered a job as a local reporter on a penny newspaper but his partial deafness meant that he could not hear well enough to follow meetings but he did contribute verses and political letters to the local papers. It was at about this time that he became acquainted with John Stuart Mill who was impressed by the way that he had educated himself. John also published Songs of Labour: Northamptonshire Rambles and other Poems in 1860 and in the front he gives an “Autobiographical Sketch” of himself.

His brother tried to give up his work as a staymakerand learn the craft of shoemaking. The local unions, however, had been in dispute with the factory owners and had passed a resoluion stating no man could be accepted into the trade who had not been apprenticed before the age of seventeen. They barred his brother from joining the trade and John wrote a pamphlet, called Freedom of Labour, attacking the monopoly of the unions, and verses against the union were also printed in the Songs of Labour. It seems that he was a radical thinker but believing in self-help and co-operatives rather than trade unions. John recounts in his autobiographical introduction to Songs of Labour that the Northampton Mercury of January 14th 1860 reported:

John was burnt in effigy, his infirmity cruelly caricatured, and his life threatened, while his brother lost much time and money in prosecuting some of his tormentors: but, after awhile, their efforts were successful. . .

On the other hand, in a letter published in the Northampton Herald in 1863, which was the Tory newspaper, he stated that, ‘the public house forms the alpha and omega of a working man’s pleasure.’ Most men went to the pub not to get drunk ‘but for the pleasure of joining in social converse and sharing the pleasure “of a bright fire, a joke, song or story.’” [A History of Kettering: R.L. Greenall.]

John had written a tract on "Capital"  which he had dedicated to Lord Brougham  who was a great champion of education for the working man. In a speech Brougham praised this tract saying that no univerity student of economic science:

". . . could have produced a better reasoned tract, or one showing more entire acquaintance with its principles"

When John read an account of the speech in the Times he was moved to write:

"Had I, the deaf, lame, neglected boy, the humble toiler, won the approbation of one of our greatest men?"

There were a number of tracts written by John against the unions and he began to exchange letters with many leading men of the day and was also granted £40 to acknowledge his writings by the Liberal Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, from "Her Majesty's Royal Bounty".

Brougham was a staunch supporter of John Cassell, also a self-educated man, from Manchester, who through books, magazines and newspapers promoted self-education among working people. Titles such as the Working Man's Friend or the Popular Educator made him famous.

After the death of his mother John, and Mary Ann, moved back to London to work for Cassell and, from a letter sent to him by J.S. Mill in 1864, we see that John had also become the London Correspondent of the Sydney Morning Herald. In 1866 the couple were living in Homer Terrace at the east end of Victoria Park. Homer Terrace was built on land leased by J.S. Mill to John James Homer in about 1858 so perhaps this was instrumental in the family’s move. Elizabeth Crawford on her website Woman and Her Sphere has told how John was leading a campaign supported by John Stuart Mill to preserve and extend Victoria Park and to prevent the erection of a large Gas Works. In 1866 a group of women had organised a petition demanding that women should have the same political rights as men and J. S. Mill, as an M.P. had added on their behalf an amendment to the Reform Bill going through Parliament to this effect. It was defeated by 196 votes to 73.

One of the women organising this petition was Mill’s stepdaughter Helen Taylor and she approached Mary Ann who signed the petition. It also seems likely that Mary Ann approached some of her neighbours and they too signed the petition. Thus Mary Ann had a small part in the Women’s Suffrage movement.

There were many letters between John Stuart Mill and John Plummer and in Mill’s replies he almost always gives his (or his daughter’s) remembrances or kind regards to “Mrs Plummer”. The couple were also invited to dinner at the Mill’s house on a number of occasions. We hear of John Plummer’s lectures and of his various journalistic work, often aimed at promoting the cause of the working man.  (One project was a newspaper called The Working Man which soon failed.) We can only sense that Mary Ann was an active part of this scene but the fact that John Stuart Mill’s daughter sent her regards via him seems to point out that Mary Ann was well regarded, and perhaps particularly in the female suffrage movement.  A typical reply, on February 9th 1867, from J.S Mill to John has information to show that it was a struggle for John and Mary Ann at times.

Dear Mr Plummer

I have to congratulate you on the birth of your daughter*, and at the same time to condole with you on the failure of the Working Man and on the termination of your engagement with Messrs Cassell#. What have you in view for your next employment? I wish it were in my power to help you to a position of profit and usefulness.

I am glad to hear of a local Jamaica Committee, and of your being a member of it. I think you should decidedly offer yourself as a witness to the Trades Union Commission. They will find few who know so much of the subject and feel so impartially on it. There must often be witnesses quite as hard of hearing as you are.

With our kind regards to Mrs Plummer, I am [etc]

*This may be Ada Mary who died just three years later. (Information from Lyn Watson.)

# John Cassell had died on 2nd April 1865.

In the 1871 Census John aged 39 is a newspaper editor. Mary is 32 and there are two sons, Albert J (12) and George E[dward] (9). It looks as if, in Albert’s middle name, that A for Abington has been replaced by J for Jenkinson.

On 6th August 1879 the Auriga from Liverpool arrived in Sydney, Australia. The 1591 ton boat had a crew of thirty men and carried just one family, John and Mary Ann, together with sons Albert (19) and Edward (16) and one other passenger, a Mr Dixon. It seems likely, therefore, that this was basically a cargo vessel which also carried a few passengers.

 

Auriga (barque)

(In 1881 sold and renamed Sierra Blanca)

"Sierra Blanca (ship, 1875) - SLV H99.220-3260" by Unknown - State Library of Victoria, Malcolm Brodie shipping collection.

It is probable that John already had a position lined up in Australia and he continued a long life of vigorous and respected journalism. It appears it was also financially successful for in 1880 he had a large house built in Birriwa Place in the surburb of Northwood which he named Thorpe Malsor (2 miles west of Kettering and the place of their wedding) and in 1896 his son built another house which he named Loddington (a village 20 miles north of Kettering in Leicestershire)on a piece of the original house's land.

On 4th June 1906 the Adelaide newspaper The Register reported that he had just had his 75th birthday. It continues:

He resides at Northwood, a lovely spot on Lane Cove River, and is one of the most remarkable of literary men in the Common wealth. Notwithstanding his advanced years, he is as vigorous as most men of 40 and gets through an enormous amount of journalistic work daily. . .

John Plummer died in March 1914 aged 84 and his obituary in the Otago Daily Times records:

Johns’s Notable Australians states that Mr. Plummer was born in London in1831. For several years he was a member of Charles Knight’s literary and statistical staff and one of the pioneers of the [Co-operative?] industrial movement. He joined John Cassell’s staff in 1862, assisting in founding and conducting the London Figaro, was two years sub-editor of the Morning Advertiser, for two years associate editor with Mr Stephen Fiske, on the Hornet and Home Journal, editor of several trade papers and for 20 years English Social Affairs correspondent of the Sydney Morning Herald. He wrote a cantata and several ballads for the Tonic Sol-fa Association. He arrived in Sydney in 1879 and became editor of the Sydney Illustrated News and also of the Sydney Tribune and several minor papers. He was a member of the Town and Country Journal staff for some time and State drawing master for nine years [at Fort Street Training School, 1881 – 90]. For seventeen years he was a contributor to the Year Book of Australia and other works of reference, and was the Australian representative of various British and American commercial, mining, financial and other journals. He was a member of the Japan Society, Royal Society of Arts and Institute of Journalists.

Obviously we have only skimmed the surface of a very full, (the list in his obituary is far from exhaustive), and, considering his disabilities, an astonishing life.

  

John Plummer c1885

Taken by J. Hubert Newman of Sydney:  State Library of NSW P1/1365

Mary Ann survived him. I believe that she died on 12th August 1919 in Sydney. The Australia Death Index 1787 – 1985 gives her father as William which is wrong but her mother’s name as Avis which is correct and is so unusual a name as to seem to prove it is our Mary Ann. As further proof she was buried in Plot C of E Section M grave 80b next to John Plummer in Gore Hill Cemetery in St Leonards Creek, Watcha Shire, NSW. Her son Albert J. (not A.) was buried in the same cemetery but in the Congregational Section.

Mary Ann’s mother Avis Jenkinson had remained at 1 Meeting Lane in Kettering and in 1881 she is there aged 75 with her unmarried eldest son John (48) who was now a shoemaker. She died on September 3rd 1887 and some seven weeks after the event the Sydney Morning Herald carried the following announcement:

JENKINSON – September 3 at Kettering, England where she had resided over 60 years, beloved by all who knew her, Avis Jenkinson, mother of Mrs John Plummer, Northwood, Lane Cove River, Sydney aged 83.

From birth to death she had travelled 10 miles.  Unfortunately, however far the distance travelled, history rarely records the lives of radical working women.

References:  My grateful thanks to Lyn Watson for starting me on this biography, providing information and sources, and for correcting some large mistakes in the first draft.

Songs of Labour: Northamptonshire Rambles: And Other Poems. John Plummer. 1860. W.Tweedie London: T. Waddington Kettering. (Can be found on various download websites). 

The Autobiography of Rev. John Jenkinson: Baptist Minister of Kettering and Oakham. Ed. R.L. Greenhall. (Northamptonshire Record Services 2010).

A History of Kettering. R.L. Greenall (Phillimore Co. Ltd. 2003)

The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (letters to John Plummer) on www.oll.libertyfund.org .

www.womanandhersphere.com  (on the 1866 Suffrage Petition).

www.findagrave.com.

www.Ancestry.co.uk.

The Story of the House of Cassell Part 1 Chap. 5 by John Cassell. (Cassell and Co.: no date given.) https://en.wikisource.org .

http://trove.nla.gov.au has various Australian newspapers including The Register (Adelaide) 4th June 1906: Otago Daily Times 10th March 1914, (found via Google).

https://commons.wikipedia.org Blanca (ship 1875). On the Auriga:

The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill; Additional Letters on http://oll.liberty.org (via Google)

http://mariners.records.nsw.gove.au/1879/08/029aur.htm  (details of Auriga crew and passengers).

 

Friday
Feb182011

Fairey, John (1804 - 1869) and Elizabeth (1800 - 1885) and their daughters. BLACKSMITH

Fairey, John (1804 - 1869) and Elizabeth (1800 - 1885) and their daughters. BLACKSMITH

 

The art, if you want your descendants to find you, is to have an obscure Christian name and, most importantly, an unusual surname. When you come across the name Fairey it would seem that it is likely to meet this second requirement. Unfortunately, in Ringstead in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, you would be wrong. Every garden seemed to have one at the bottom and, just to confuse matters a wide range of variations were used including Feary, Fairy, Farry and Farey. Even more annoyingly, the various families seem to keep their distance from each other and we end up with a shrubbery rather than a tree.

It seems that there were at least two lines which may be completely separate or join some time in the seventeenth century. Broadly there were the blacksmith Faireys and the shoemaker Faireys and it is with the former that we will be looking at in this story and, in particular, at a black sheep member of the blacksmiths. 

The Faireys were an old Ringstead family which reaches back at least into the seventeenth century. We will start with John and Elizabeth who married in Ringstead Parish Church on 1st January 1700. We are in the reign of William and Mary and a new century has just begun. They have a son, Samuel who is baptised on 19th December 1703 and lives long enough to have three wives. He first married Elizabeth Desborough on 12th November 1730 and has at least one child, a daughter, Elizabeth. His wife dies in June 1735 and within six months he has re-married, to Ann Jones, and has a further four children. It seems likely that Ann died in giving birth to her fourth child, Joseph in 1754. Just two months later he marries again, to Keziah Pell and has two further sons.

We do not know Samuel’s profession but his son, the oldest child of his marriage to Ann, who is called William was a blacksmith. He was baptized on 12th September 1737 and married Ann, probably when he was about twenty, although I have not yet found their marriage. They had at least five children before Ann died in 1774, but it may be that only one girl, Mary, survived into adulthood. William re-married on 3rd May 1779 to Mary Wright and had a son, William who was baptised on 25th December 1780. It is at the death of William, the father, in 1784 aged about 47, that we find him described as a blacksmith. His widow dies some twenty years later in 1804 so we have to wonder how she managed until her children grew old enough to work. Did she employ men to run the forge or did it pass into other hands?

When we look at these rapid re-marriages we may see it as callous and perhaps sometimes it was. We must remember, however, that, unless there were available older children, aunts or parents to take on the raising of a young family, a father, or mother, often had a choice of re-marriage, child neglect, or pauperism.

Whatever happened in the intervening years we know that William, the son, continued with his father’s trade and married Elizabeth, probably some time after the turn of the century. Again I have not yet found the marriage but we know, once again from his entry in the Burial Register that he was a blacksmith. They had some six children, four of them were girls and the youngest son, William, born in 1811 died just twenty years later. In fact, one wonders at the cluster of deaths in the family. After William’s death on 17th November 1831, his father died aged 53 almost exactly a year later and, in the following month Elizabeth his mother also died aged 52. Was it from these clusters of deaths in a family that Ringstead’s reputation for witchcraft grew?

Before these sudden deaths, John, the eldest child had married, on 24th December 1828 to Eliza Betts, across the Nene, in Woodford Parish Church. By the end of 1832 he was a husband, a father and the head of the family left by his parents, although even Lucy, the youngest surviving sister, would have been nearly eighteen. Unfortunately he was not equal to the task. We must be careful in defining someone’s character by a few bad actions but it does appear that John was a feckless man who literally ran away from his responsibilities.

As Henry VIII looked to succession and wanted a son, so a blacksmith would have hoped for a boy to learn the trade, to help his father and finally take over in his old age. We see the sadness of Joe Gargery in Great Expectations when Pip blithely leaves the forge to become a ‘gentleman’. John, like Henry, struggled to father boys and he had between 1830 and 1839, six girls in quick succession, none of whom were christened as children. Is this a sign of non-conformism or negligence? One also wonders at the mindset of parents with the surname Fairey who call their first child Mary (and their last child Fanny). Perhaps it may indicate that they pronounced their surname more like ‘Farry’ or 'Feary'.

As might be expected, the Faireys struggled to feed and clothe their family. The Ringstead Charity Account Book reveals that in 1837 John received 8yards of cloth at 9½d a yard and 3yards at 13d a yard: also one handkerchief. In 1838 he again received sheets and other cloth items. 

It is when we get to the first personal census, in 1841, that we realise that something is really amiss in the Fairey family. We find Eliza aged 35 with her six girls; Mary (11), Emily (9), Louisa (7), Sophia (5), Hannah (4), and Maria(h) (2). There is no sign of John, and Eliza is described by that feared word, ‘Pauper’. When we search for John, we finally find a John Fairey (34) blacksmith, living in the small town of Thorney, on the edge of the Huntingdonshire fens. With him live William and Mary Wood and Henry Harvey.

It is possible that he is away getting work to feed his family but when we look at the Northampton Mercury we find the truth. It reports that John Farey from Ringstead was sent to the House of Correction for running away and leaving his wife chargeable to Ringstead. Perhaps absconding once, overcome by the recent deaths and his responsibilities, we might excuse his inability to cope. The following year, in 1842, it happens again. John is sent, this time, for two months ‘to the House of Correction for neglecting to support his wife and family, whereby they became chargeable to the Parish of Ringstead’. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 had attempted to stop outdoor relief and force recipients into centralised ‘Union Workhouses’ where conditions should be harsh enough to deter paupers using them. The local workhouse was at Thrapston but the Parish would still have to pay for their upkeep and, as the vicar Percival Sandilands pointed out in 1864, Ringstead considered that it paid a very high Poor Rate. William Howitt, who was no radical, was appalled by this new harsher regime and, writing in 1838 in the ‘Rural Life in England, stated:

…. Every poor man’s family is liable, on the occurrence of some chance stroke of misfortune, to have their misfortune, bitter enough in itself, added the tenfold aggravation of being torn asunder, and immured in the separate wards of a POVERTY PRISON. The very supposition is horrible; and, if this system, this iron and undiscriminating system, - a blind tyranny, knowing no difference between accidental misfortune and habitual idleness, between worthy poverty and audacious imposition, between misfortune and crime, - be the product of Philanthropy, may Philanthropy be sunk to the bottom of the sea! 

John would have been called one of the 'undeserving poor' and it was his wife and children who suffered.

When we look at the blacksmiths that worked in Ringstead a pattern emerges of a group of young men travelling around the countryside and sometimes getting into mischief. Flora Thompson writing of the blacksmiths tells us:           

….it was the custom at that time that after apprenticeship, a young smith should travel the country and work in various shops to gain experience. That was why they were called ‘journeymen’, Miss Lane said, ‘because they travelled about.’

This may not be the whole story. Certainly for some young smiths it was their Grand Tour when they gained skills working away from their ‘home forge’ before returning to the family business. These groups of travelling young men were not uncommon in a number of professions, from agricultural labourers to shoemakers. Most travelled to find work rather than to improve their skills. In those days when holidays, as we know them, did not exist for working people the ‘tramp’ would also be a time when the young men saw the world and perhaps sowed their wild oats. In this they were not so different from the rich young men who went to Italy. It is also true that, although some blacksmiths prospered, many found it increasingly difficult to make a living

Of course there were horses to shoe but this was not always work for the blacksmiths. The 1851 Ringstead Census has George Buckby, ‘farrier’, living with William Teel, a gamekeeper from County Fermanagh in Ireland. Many larger farmers brought in specialised farriers to shoe and attend to their horses. The blacksmiths' other stock-in-trade had been the production of all the ironware for the home and farm. The agricultural implements became increasingly more mechanised and were produced in centralised factories. The well-named ‘Smiths of Thrapston’, was a large local producer of farm implements for horse and, as the century progressed, for steam engine. The home and garden goods; the gates, door furniture, tools, nails, kitchen implements, etc. were likewise made cheaply in the new industrial cities or imported from abroad. The village blacksmith was left mainly with minor repair work and some horse-shoeing and, for many, this was not enough to make a good living.

Going back to the 1841 Census we find two young blacksmiths, John Hitchcock (25) and his wife, Sarah (nee Hewitt) with their young son, John; and John Jeffrey, with a Mary Jeffrey who is only shown as fifteen (although this has been probably rounded down) who may be his sister or wife.

It is in the life of another black sheep, Korah Dicks, that we first met Henry Hitchcock. Korah was sent to the ‘House of Correction’, for one month for assaulting Henry. He was an outsider, from Kimbolton and one wonders if this is part of the reason for the assault. By 1851 Henry and his family have disappeared from Ringstead and we find him, by 1861, in Plaistow, London and still a blacksmith.

Returning to John Jeffrey, he too disappears from Ringstead and possibly moves to Linton in Cambridgeshire. We cannot be sure because the 1841 Census does not give places of birth and ‘John Jeffrey’ is a popular name for smiths from Cornwall to Scotland.

Our final example is John Tomlin who is listed as a blacksmith in Ringstead in Whellan’s 1849 Directory. It also records that a ‘blacksmith’s shop has lately been converted into a Methodist Chapel’. John Tomlin is one of those elusive people who seem to dodge between the official records. He is, almost certainly, the John Valentine Tomblin who married Caroline Wallis on 12th September 1847 in Alconbury-cum-Weston in Huntingdonshire. The couple have a child, William, who is baptised in Ringstead on 25th April 1849 and buried two years later in Thrapston. It seems possible that John had already left Ringstead for there is no sign of him in the 1851 Census. On 30th November 1856, a John Valentine Tomlin, ‘a traviling Blacksmith Aged 35 years’, was buried in Lincoln. 

John Fairey was, therefore, part of a constant movement of young men around the countryside but he was no longer so young and he had many dependants. It seems that John did return home and the couple were, to some extent reconciled, because another daughter, Fanny, was born in about 1845 and baptised on 12th August 1849 with her older sisters, Louisa, Hannah and Maria. Is this a sign that John has finally become a proper family man? Certainly, the 1851 Census has John with his family in Ringstead. He is working as a blacksmith and Eliza is making lace, as many women in the area did in the first half of the nineteenth century. Her daughters, Sophia (16), Hannah (14) and Maria (12) are also lacemakers and Fanny, the baby of the family is just five years old. 

By 1861, however, we find the rift between John and Eliza has opened up again. He is a journeyman blacksmith which, at 56, means that he is still working how and when he can. He is living by himself. Meanwhile, Eliza, and her youngest child, Fanny, are living elsewhere in the village. She is still trying to earn a living as a lacemaker.

 

Former Blacksmith’s shop taken by Roy Dickens in 1980s

(Carlow Road end of High Street)

Roy remembers Mr Davies working there and, with few horses to shoe, finally having to spend his day making rods with screw threads each end to reinforce ladder rungs

(By kind permission of Roy Dickens)

John dies in 1869, aged 64, which seems a reasonable age for a nineteenth century blacksmith. Perhaps his lack of time in the blacksmith's forge added years to his life. If we look at some of the blacksmiths that we have encountered, we see that many died in middle age or earlier. John Fairey’s grandfather, William, died when he was about 47 and his father William was 53: William Bradshaw, who later became the postmaster, was 52 and his nephew Frederick 53, and John Tomlin just 35 years old.

It is easy to have an idealised view of the village blacksmith (albeit from America) ‘under the spreading chestnut tree’. Richard Jefferies, another lyrical writer of the countryside from the Victorian era, gives a more realistic picture of what a typical smithy would have been like.

Twisted iron, rusty from exposure, lies in confusion on the blackened ground before the shed. Coal dust and the carbon deposited from volumes of thick smoke have darkened the earth, and coated everything with a thick crust. The windows of the shed are broken, probably by the accidental contact of long rods of iron carelessly cast aside, and some of the slates of the roof appear gone just above the furnace, as if removed for ventilation and the escape of the intense heat. There is a creaking of stiff leather as the bellows rise and fall, and the roar of the blast as it is forced through the glowing coals

A ceaseless hum of wheels in motion comes from the rear, and the peculiar crackling sound of a band in rapid revolution round the drum of the engine and the shaft. Then the grinding scrape of sharp steel on iron as the edge of the tool cuts shavings from the solid metal rotating swiftly in the lathe. As blow follows blow the red hot ‘scale’, driven from the surface of the iron on the anvil by the heavy sledge, flies rattling against the window in a spray of fire. The ring of metal, the clatter, the roaring, and hissing of steam, fill the air, and through it rises now and then the shrill quick calls of men in command

This may have been a larger blacksmith’s shop than the ones in Ringstead but, like the water mills we have written about elsewhere, they were not always the fragrant, healthy places that the poets and artists depict.

Interior of a Forge

(Country Life Journal March 1904. MERL P DX1091/8)

With the kind permission of The Museum of English Rural Life

The 1871 Census finds Eliza, aged 69, a visitor at 20 Russell Street Cambridge. It is the house of Alfred Pateman, a railway servant and his wife Emma (38). It seems likely that ‘Emily’ is Eliza’s daughter Emma. Eliza may be already losing her sight, perhaps, like many other women, through the making of lace for years by the dim light of a candle. Certainly in 1881 she is, I believe, in Thrapston Union Workhouse, although it gives her home town as Stanwick, and it records that she has been blind for eight years. On 25th September 1885, aged 85, she dies at Thrapston Workhouse but is buried back in the Ringstead churchyard.

 

Postscript: The Daughters

Eliza Fairey had had a hard life, with a large family of girls which she had to bring up, it seems, with little help from her wandering husband. I wondered what had happened to these daughters. Did they manage to shake off the effects of their difficult childhoods and enjoy a fulfilled adult life? We can only look for hints that the records give us.

Mary, the oldest child, probably married John Hale in 1855 in Meldreth in Cambridgeshire, and the 1861 Census finds her living in nearby Melbourn with their two sons, John and George. It is difficult to find her after that as there are a number of alternatives, none certain. It could be that her widower, John, with his children, George and Eliza, is in the Cambridge 1881 Census but we cannot be sure.

The life of Mary’s sister, Emily, is also somewhat confusing at present. She  is probably the Emma Fairey who married William Stockridge in 1857. William died a year afterwards and just a few months later she married railway servant, Alfred Pateman. We have seen that Eliza, her mother was staying with her in Cambridge in 1871. There is also a niece, Emma, the daughter of Mary.  They are together in 1881 but Emma died in1883 aged about 52, the same age as her grandparents. In 1891 Emma Hales, aged 27 is Alfred’s niece and housekeeper.

Louisa, after working as a farm servant on the farm for Henry Gale at Denford, married John Underwood in 1856 and moved to Finedon. She spent the rest of her life there. Her husband, John, was an agricultural labourer and it would have been a tough life. She had six children and also worked as a charwoman. Her husband became a railway labourer, then a ‘higler’s labourer’ (perhaps for his brother-in-law) and finally in 1901 as a farm labourer again. In this census we find her and John in Pear Tree Row, Finedon. She died in 1905

Sophia Fairey married John Griffin in 1855 in Ringstead and she was the only daughter to remain in her home village all her life. Her husband was an agricultural labourer and we finally find the couple in 1881 with John an unemployed waggoner and Sophia a laundress. In 1911 she is a seventy-seven year old widow visiting Leonard and Laura Bryant at 28 Regent Square, Northampton. She probably died a year later

Hannah, the fifth child, had one of the most interesting lives. She had been born in about 1837 and was the only daughter never to marry. In 1871, she is with her mother visiting her sister in Cambridge and her profession is given as a ‘domestic servant’. By 1881, her mother has gone blind and is in Thrapston Union Workhouse. Hannah, however, has moved to London and, at 44, is a ‘Matron’ in Reverend C.H. Spurgeons’s Orphanage in Clapham Road, Lambeth. She is still there in 1891 where she is one of seventeen matrons.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon was a charismatic Baptist preacher in London. By 22 he was the most popular preacher of the day who regularly preached to crowds of 10,000 people. A clergyman’s widow who was a member of Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle Church had seen an article in the Sword and Trowel (the Tabernacle magazine which is still published) for August 1866 advocating the establishment of schools for’ ‘our poor adherents’. The widow, a Mrs. Hillyard wrote to Charles Spurgeon telling him that she would fund an orphanage where boys could be ‘trained in simple Gospel principles’. Spurgeon went to her modest house with another man and said that they had called about the £200 she had mentioned in her letter. In his biography of Spurgeon, W.Y. Fullerton continues with the conversation:

                ‘Did I write £200?’ exclaimed the lady. ‘I meant £20,000.’

‘Oh yes,’ said Mr. Spurgeon, ‘you did put down £20,000, but I thought perhaps there was a nought or two too many.’

The orphanage was opened in 1869 with a girls' wing added ten years later. Hannah, who one would have expected to have become a recipient of the charity given by the great Victorian philanthropic movement, became, instead, one of its agents. If we judge from the experiences of Peter Paterson, who was an a boy there later, in the years before it was bombed in the Second World War, it was a harsh and cruel regime with regular beatings but one where the 3 R’s were taught. We can only hope that Hannah was a kinder matron than the one that he encountered

It is possible that Spurgeon had preached in Ringstead and this had inspired Hannah, although he was, perhaps, too big a fish for the Ringstead pond. Certainly, Rev C, Spurgeon Junior, his son, preached in the Baptist Chapel in May 1882 and again in 1883. We do not know just how long Hannah worked at the orphanage but, in 1901, she is still in Marylebone, staying as a friend, with a woman ‘living on her own means’ and her lady companion. She does not appear in the 1911 Census.

Maria married Thomas Smeathers Pettit in 1859 and, like her sister Louisa ended up in Finedon. Thomas was, a carter in 1861, a General Dealer at Wilby in 1871 and a ’Rag and Bone Buyer’ in 1881. By 1891 they are living in a’ Railway Carriage’ with their four children, in Finedon, next to the Co-operative Field. Thomas has a ‘Dealer Shop’. By 1901 he is a ‘Rag and Bone Merchant’ again and they are living in Thrapston Road, Finedon. Maria dies in 1904 aged 65. Thomas was obviously a colourful local character for a rhyme about him, under his nickname of Tom Tottles, was recorded in a local book.

 Tom Tottles breaks bottles

Sifts cinders, mends winders,

Goes round with his bags

To collect your old rags.

He mumbles and moans

As he buys your old bones

And kicks up a din

As loud as sin

When he hollers ‘Rag-bone!’

Rag-bone! Rabbit skin!’

 

[From Pageant of Finedon]

Finally we come to Fanny, the last girl, perhaps a product of John’s temporary return to the bosom of his family. She married Charles Frederick Coggins from Raunds in 1864 when she was just eighteen. Seven years later she has four children between two months and six years old and is in Thrapston Union Workhouse. I have not yet found Charles (or Frederick as he is usually called) in 1871 but perhaps he is away looking for work. In 1881 Frederick, Fanny and their family are living in St John’s Place Marylebone and he is working again as a shoemaker. 1891 finds them still there, and with two extra children, bringing the total that Fanny has given birth to, to at least nine. They are now living at 87 Devonshire Street, Marylebone with three other families. Charles Frederick Coggins died in 1892 and the 1901 Census finds Fanny a widow at 54 and having to work as a charwoman, with her youngest daughter, May, who is just 14 years old. She is probably the Fanny Coggins who died in the Paddington District in 1911 aged sixty-five.

So it is that names come and go. William Feary baptized in 1737 had six children and his son William had six also and his son John had seven more, yet by the end of the century no-one from that family branch was named Fairey. Such is the power of the male name in ancestry.

References

Ringstead BMD (Northampton Record Office and Rushdenheritage)

1841, 1851, 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1901 Censuses

Northampton Mercury 1841, 1842 exact dates later. (www.northants-familytree.net)

Charles Haddon Spurgeon. A Biography. W.Y. Fullerton (www.spurgeon.org/misc/bio12.htm )

Ringstead Charity Account Book (Southwick Hall archive)

Whellan’s Directory of Northamptonshire 1849 (Northampton Record office

Lark Rise to Candleford. Flora Thompson (Oxford 1845)

Hodge and His Masters Vol II. Richard Jefferies (1880; 1966 MacGibbon & Kee)

The Rural Life of England Vol.II. William Howitt (Longmans, Orme, Brown, Green & Longmans 1838)

Wellingborough News 3rd June 1882 (www.rushdenheritage.co.uk )

Blacksmith Shop Photograph 35/4492 (Museum Of English Rural Life)

Pageant of Finedon. Reginald Underwood (Fortune Press 1943)

Much More Of This Old Boy..? Peter Paterson (Muswell Press 2011)